On 1 July 2026, the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development is now part of the new Ministry for Cities, Environment, Regions and Transport.

About the report

The independent report estimates the economic effects of the Maunga viewshaft overlays using an Alonso-Muth-Mills (AMM) spatial equilibrium model calibrated to Auckland’s housing market.  

The model is calibrated to Auckland’s land values, house prices, and population distribution – that is, how much people are willing to pay to live in certain places, how much they’re willing to commute, and some other factors that change the shape of the city. Zoning controls are then removed from the land affected by viewshafts so that the viewshaft or HSA is the only binding constraint on development. This lets the report isolate the effect of the viewshafts and HSAs. The model is then run again with each, all, and groups of, different viewshafts and HSAs removed, to see how the city might have developed if that viewshaft of HSA was never there. This changes how many houses could be built (and as a result, house prices and rents), and where they might have been built, which affects commuting costs and productivity. It gives us a picture of how the city might change if viewshafts and HSAs were removed.

About Auckland’s Maunga viewshafts

Auckland’s volcanic cones are prominent landforms that define the city’s skyline. The Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP), made operative in part in November 2016, includes a set of viewshaft overlays designed to protect views of and between selected Maunga from designated public vantage points. These are defined in Chapter D14 of the AUP as “volcanic viewshafts and height sensitive areas” and place restrictions on maximum building height for properties within each designated sight line.